The politicization of the Justice Department is not new. However, on August 8, 2022, when armed FBI agents raided the home of former President Donald Trump—citing alleged violations of the Presidential Records Act and the Espionage Act—the weaponization of the nation’s top law enforcement organization reached new heights.
The FBI seized approximately 13,000 documents, about 100 of which bore classification markings. President Biden publicly criticized Trump for being reckless, but soon thereafter, over 100 classified documents, dating back five decades, were discovered in Biden’s possession. Trump was indicted on forty felony charges, while Biden faced no charges.
Then there was the attempt to imprison Donald Trump for clerical error in a legal payments to a porn star leading to 34 felony charges introduced by a prosecutor who ran on “getting Trump.” Another travesty of justice, recognized by the most respected and liberal legal minds, whose reverence for the law far exceeds their hatred for Donald Trump.
These are just two of four attempts to use hyper-partisan State Democratic District
Attorneys to prevent having to compete with political opponents at the ballot box discussed in Lawfare. This represents another attack on Democracy from the same Democrats who have the gall to claim Donald Trump is a threat to Democracy.
Fast Facts
- Lawfare is the use of legal systems and institutions to damage or delegitimize an opponent, or to deter an individual’s usage of their legal rights.
- Anti freedom culture of political retaliation and abuse of power has all been under the Democrats driven by the Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Lawfare
Lawfare covers the use of a justice department to intimidate, hinder, imprison, or bankrupt political opponents rather than face them in the voting both. Rampant in politically and economically unstable countries, the Biden administration’s Department of Justice and Democratic appointed state judges took it to levels previously unheard of in the US. The initial focus, but definitely not the sole, was Donald Trump, who was indicted in 4 criminal cases in an effort to rig the election. The Democrats figured that Biden couldn’t lose if he was running against a convicted felon. This led to a total onslaught to destroy Donald Trump, either by putting him in jail, or making sure he has no more money.
What they failed to account for, however, were that most Americans were too smart not to recognize this attack on Democracy using the Department of Justice. The same Democrats who unleashed Lawfare on Donald Trump and his supporters have done more to destroy our justice system than anyone in history.
New York Hush Money Case
Former President Donald Trump was indicted in New York City on March 30, 2023, for bookkeeping errors his lawyer made in recording LEGAL hush money payments to hide allegations of extramarital affairs airing during his first White House campaign in 2016. The prosecutor, District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who ran on “getting Trump,” rather upholding the law, charged Trump for 34 felonies, one for each receipt. Sentencing was scheduled for Nov. 26, 2024 to avoid perceptions of election influence. To bad the concern for the perception of election interference does not extend to a concern over election interference.
Trump was found guilty on May 30, 2024, of 34 counts of falsifying business records. The first former American president to be convicted of felony crimes. Judge Juan M. Merchan agreed to postpone Donald Trump’s sentencing until Nov. 26, 2024 to avoid perceptions of election influence.
Afterwards numer
Source
- “Biomass Explained – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).” Www.eia.gov, www.eia.gov/energyexplained/biomass.
Source
- “Biomass Explained – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).” Www.eia.gov, www.eia.gov/energyexplained/biomass.
Georgia Election Interference
After election irregularities were reported by poll watchers in Fulton County, Georgia during the 2020 presidential voting Donald Trump questioned the results. Years later State Election Board member Janice Johnson claimed 140 violations in election laws and rules occurred, validating Trump’s concerns. Trump’s asking the Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to check signatures, since he believed there was fraud, was turned into election interference after he mentioned how few fraudulent votes it would take for the election to be overturned. Knowing how few votes would make a difference was obviously critical to knowing whether it was worth the effort to check the validity of the ballots, was turned into a request for changing votes by Democratic prosecutors.
Source
- “Biomass Explained – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).” Www.eia.gov, www.eia.gov/energyexplained/biomass.
Classified Documents Case
O
O
sssss
His lawyer maade a clerical error in recording hush money payments to a porn star, The prosecutor, District Attorney Alvin Bragg,who ran on “getting Trump,” rather upholding the law charged him for 34 felonies for a clerical error in recording the payments.
the strategic use of legal proceedings to intimidate or hinder an opponent biomass.
Source
- “Biomass Explained – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).” Www.eia.gov, www.eia.gov/energyexplained/biomass.
Friend or Foe
Like as.
Many (if not more) biomass renewable energy projects provide minimal reductions or increase GHG emissions. Activists, politicians, and even countries have used biomass renewable energy projects, which are an abomination to the environment, for no pain (beyond higher taxes for consumers) green credentials.
Trees and Climate Change
Trees remove (sequester) carbon CO2 from the atmosphere when provided with adequate water, sunlight, and warmth. The carbon captured by a tree returns to the atmosphere as CO2 if it is burned in a wildfire or electrical generating plant. When a plant decays, as the leaves fall off during seasonal changes, the carbon in the leaves returns to the atmosphere as CO2 or methane (CH4). Trees generate methane when located in wetlands, such as the Amazon and other warm climates.
Methane Transport
While climate change activists and politicians falsely claim that the Amazon produces 20% of the Earth’s oxygen, methane transport due to seasonal flooding (floodplains), and transport to the atmosphere by trees goes unnoticed. Some researchers claim the methane released from the Amazon equals that from all of the world’s oceans combined.
Accelerating Global Warming to Appear Green
While Europeans lecture the developing world about not building coal power plants due to their carbon footprints, they take credit for zero emissions while burning wood from mature trees cut to generate electricity that produces more CO2 than coal, with many more toxic emissions.
Source
- Fuller, Gary. “Pollutionwatch: Wood Burning Is Not Climate Friendly.” The Guardian, 1 Mar. 2018, www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/mar/01/pollutionwatch-wood-burning-is-not-climate-friendly.
- Le Page, Michael. “Revealed: The Renewable Energy Scam Making Global Warming Worse.” New Scientist, 21 Sept. 2016, www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130922-600-revealed-the-renewable-energy-scam-making-global-warming-worse/.
After the media picked up on this loophole in the Paris Climate Agreement, and true environmentalists, (in contrast to the virtue-signaling hypocrites) the European Union was forced to re-evaluate their decision to provide pain-free green credits for increasing greenhouse gas emissions. Their refusal to change their stance was not surprising since the biggest virtue signalers are typically the least virtuous.
Biofuels
Biofuel is a type of renewable energy derived from organic materials, primarily plant and animal sources.
Source
- Jeswani, Harish K., et al. “Environmental Sustainability of Biofuels: A Review.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 476, no. 2243, Nov. 2020, p. 20200351, 10.1098/rspa.2020.0351.
“Early Days of Coal Research.” Energy.gov, www.energy.gov/fecm/early-days-coal-research. Accessed 22 Oct. 2022.
Similar to wind and solar, biofuels require large amounts of land relative to the energy produced. In countries with energy-intensive farming, like the US, it is questionable whether the energy produced even equals the energy required to produce the biofuel. Consequently, biofuels in the US is politically driven by a powerful farm lobby, rather than energy independence or environmental concerns.
Source
- O’malley, Jane, and Stephanie Searle. The Impact of the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard on Food and Feed Prices BACKGROUND on the RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARD and NATIONAL DEBATE. 2021.
Source
- Lark, Tyler J., et al. “Environmental Outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119, no. 9, 14 Feb. 2022, p. e2101084119, 10.1073/pnas.2101084119.
- Douglas, Leah. “U.S. Corn-Based Ethanol Worse for the Climate than Gasoline, Study Finds.” Reuters, 14 Feb. 2022, www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-corn-based-ethanol-worse-climate-than-gasoline-study-finds-2022-02-14/.
- Lewandrowski, Jan, et al. “The Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Corn Ethanol – Assessing Recent Evidence.” Biofuels, vol. 11, no. 3, 25 Mar. 2019, pp. 1–15, 10.1080/17597269.2018.1546488.